Thread:TheFreddyFromThePizzaria/@comment-31604582-20170705154304/@comment-26186871-20170709134203

XD

Yeah, we can't make those be actual theories! So, we need to keep our theories realistic. Condition #2 indeed.

FNAF CAN be explained in a way that makes sense, and doesn't contradict scientific laws. Even teleportation is actually scientifically plausible! ...Walking through walls, however, isn't.

This realism condition is also what I use to debunk the Dream Theory. How could a small child know enough advanced scientific mechanisms to construct a complex, and actually realistic springlock suits, or know about the legal/buisness side of pizzerias?

Also, the two go hand and hand. There are some theories that are realistic, and separately, don't contradict FNAF evidence. But, it must be realistic in a scenario that doesn't contradict evidence.

For example, what if we said the Purple Guy was the one who stuffed the bodies into suits? Scientifically plausible? Yes. It contradicts evidence, however, as we the Puppet doing it.

The Puppet COULD have taken the bodies out just to put them back in, and it no longer "contradicts" evidence. But now it's not realistic anymore-Why would anyone do that..? That's an example of a theory never breaking either condition on its own-They have to be put together to debunk the theory! They BOTH have to fulfilled at the same time. You can't just flip-flop between them and say it fulfilled both.