Thread:Butterflyunicorn/@comment-26186871-20191218114428/@comment-26186871-20191223020837

I'm searching through to see if I can find it.

"While light in of itself is good, that doesn't mean all uses of it is good."

This tells us that an absolute judgement that one is good because they use the Light is a bad thing to do.

Darkness in the Fosiverse is simply the absence of Light.

"Galeem is what happens when perfectionism is someone's main philosophy. The idea that anything with any darkness at all.. Must be eliminated. This is why after everyone was destroyed, Galeem made a new world, and called it "The World of Light". It was going to contain zero darkness whatsoever."

All have Darkness within them. Trying to destroy all Darkness is only doable by destroying all Light. YES, Darkness is "evil", but there is NOBODY (except maybe some celestials over in the world of the Source itself, which is the place described as the home of gods in mythology. [The descriptions aren't accurate, but they did inspire these myths of a divine place.]) who has no Darkness.

That actually leads us right in to the doctrine that we need something else to purify us. "Darkness" and "sin" are actually very similar concepts. And what do you get when you replace "darkness" with "sin" in the narrative I gave? The doctrine of depravity, of course! The idea that NOBODY is without evil!