Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26186871-20160702185839

Just like the Dream Theory, the Bite of '83 theory is very popular, and MatPat even took the side of the Bire of '83- at least before he switched over to the Dream Theory. However, the Bite of '83 simply could not have existed, the FNAF4 bitr HAD to be the Bite of '87. Why? Well, let's start with the most commonly-used evidence-The toys that the ittle girl is playing with, plus the Mangle plush, proves the toys were around at the time, and since the toy location was only open for a few short weeks, this CANNOT be in 1983, but must be in 1987. Now, we're going to use some of the Bite of '83 evidence AGAINST the Bite of '83! The TV advertisment that is dated 1983 is clearly missing SpringBonnie, and contains Freddy, Bonnie, Chica, and Foxy, which we do not actually see in the pizzeria. The ad is clearly outdated, so that means the year must be LATER than 1983! But what happened to these four animatronics? Did they get withered? Next, the phone call about the child living without a frontal lobe. While yes, the crying child does eventually die, as the Night 6 ending shows, WHEN he dies is crucial here. We clearly see the child having nightmares that contain that VERY SAME PHONE CALL, just in reverse. The child was alive when the Phone Guy made that statement. And he was amazed at it, too. But, why would the Bite of '87 be what amazes Phone Guy about it, if a previous Bite of '83 vicitm has ALSO survived, to this very DAY? Wouldn't the first bite bictim, one that has survived four years longer, be more impressive? Surely, the bite of FNAF4 MUST be the Bite of '87.

Summary:Since there are toys of the Toys in FNAF4, the 1983 ad is inconsistent with the actual FNAF4 building, likely due to the four missing animatronics becoming witered, and the crying child from FNAF4 was ALIVE when Phone Guy was amazed at such a feat, the FNAF4 bite MUST be the Bite of '87, not an extra Bite of '83, 