Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-30744559-20180214200821/@comment-26186871-20180215145021

Well, yeah. That’s why if I make my own wikia sometime, I won’t make there even BE other bureaucrats. I mean, admin’s high enough to make their own rules and enforce them, so why would you even NEED a second bureaucrat, especially since the most admins that one could see on large-scale wikias is around 10-20? That’s still small enough for one person to pick out. And yes, demote them if they go crazy. Which is a common thing to happen, especially at the start, likely because at the time, they weren’t ready for it... Or they’re one of those who wanted to be admin just for the power. (Basically, bureaucrats are probably SUPPOSED to be for the owners, or, if it’s owned my multiple people, I guess THAT’s when there’d be more than one: Co-owners.)

If FANDOM was more specific about this, and said that bureaucrats were meant for owners (considering the structure, this is almost certainly the case), maybe we wouldn’t have this problem. So.. This is just a case of Fandom staff being useless.