Board Thread:Theory and Debate board/@comment-26186871-20180106142159

I've seen arguments against FFPS being FNAF6. But, none of these arguments actually work... Here's why.

Scott saying it wasn't FNAF6 was a troll. Come on guys, we know Scott's a troll.

And hey, that withered Chica could always be for the third book or for FNAF7. You know how Scott is about saying something's the last game and still making another one. This would be his fourth time. *wink*

FNAF3's ending:In the corner, Scott mentions the series being a trilogy, making FNAF3 the last game. After its release, Freddy's hat was laying on the ground as a teaser, implying the series was over.

FNAF4:The Final Chapter. Scott even directly stated multiple times that there would NOT be a FNAF5. Fandom was split between those who said there'd be a FNAF5, and those who quoted this as definitive proof that the franchise is over. (We all know what bappened. There was a FNAF5.)

Sister Location:Watch the trailer and see how it fits a finale. Fandom once again called this the finale.

FNAF6:It's the same thing. This could be a FNAF3 situation, with stuff still happening in prequel games.

Survival Handbook's teaser is not evidence against FFPT being FNAF6. It just means there's probably going to be a game afterwards, or that could just be a teaser for the already confirmed third book. (Twisted Ones got teasers, after all) Who said FNAF6 had to be the last game? (And once again, THREE times we thought FNAF was ending. We were wrong every single one of those times.)

Also, come on, play past Round 3 of the pizza simulator and watch in unfold into FNAF6 in front of your very eyes... Then back to a tycoon.. Then back to FNAF6. (Also, the file name is FNAF6. :3) 