Board Thread:ROLEPLAY/@comment-34100315-20180410015437/@comment-26186871-20180420010630

(My original narrative was both to give a story to the roleplay, and to explain ALL the rules that you had set so far. I attempted to make it as close to your idea as possible, while also following the very little canon that you DID set forth-As in, characters from other worlds being sent to the void. Hence, when I found there was a contradiction.. Well, you saw the first steps of how I was going to alter the narrative to account for that. You were going to see the full altered narrative eventually as well. I didn't know you were acually passing off canon in general to me-I was acting as a secondary canon creator.)

(Then again, that would be contradicting yourself too, as the player was confirmed as a canon entity according to this quote:"You pick a set of characters and you are given a portal which can pull out all sorts of things." Guess that was the plan all along, as otherwise you'd say "they are given a portal." I should have known it was an error here..)

(Well, I guess you still have the chance to make an avatar. And I guess the Avatar Hypothesis ISN'T wrong, since it became canon the moment I introduced it.. So.. Soon I'll re-edit the page I made for it to bring back the Avatar narrative.)

(But yeah. Sirius isn't the only one of his kind. I created the narrative with the intent that Sirius was just another one of the players. Another one of the creators. If I ever planned on having there be one grand creator, above EVERYONE else, it would probably have something to do with you, considering you're the one who created the roleplay to begin with. I made the origins of the program a mystery for a reason... I myself didn't have the answer.)

(I didn't know I was basically becoming the GM by doing this. But.. I guess it was working out so far..?)

(I still don't plan on revealing who created the program anytime soon. Well, maybe I will, but I won't have them appear. After all, they pretty much just left it up to the Avatars. Besides, I don't plan on ending the roleplay by having the "mission" be "complete". The battle between good and evil would continue. Plus, you can't exactly kill an avatar.. This is to prevent people from, and I quote:"go on a genocidal rampage and kill everyone". By making it literally impossible for the avatars to die, Rule 4 enforces itself!)

(Though, in the original post, you said some actions are "locked" until certain other actions have been completed first. As I don't know what they are, I won't be able to properfly enforce that.. So look out for those, and say if their action was invalid. Narratively, I would simply consider it as a "locked" action, with the actions that must be done first being "quests".)

(By the way, as I said in an earlier post, nobody said that all avatars have to be good.. That alone implies there's supposed to be more than one. And also shatters the assumption that evil avatars cannot exist. So, if someone wanted to.. Yes, they could. That's why I added clauses to prevent someone from, say, trying to break the rules on purpose to break the system and destroy the simulated world. Such as it only specifically being YOUR processor that overload if you spam characters..)